What an unedifying sight: two ‘fighters’ brawling at a press conference after a boxing match one of them wasn’t even involved in.
It underlined the ludicrousness of violence for entertainment. Were these men in a ring throwing their fists with such abandon, the audience would be applauding, after parting with large amounts of cash to view the spectacle.
Instead, their ego-driven, dignity-deficient display was met with hand wringing from the boxing authorities and horror from the journalists who witnessed it.
My question in these circumstances is always, ‘what do you expect?’. It’s the same question I ask when men and women who are trained to fight and kill an enemy abroad, mete out barbaric treatment to the enemy when captured. The public reaction is horror and surprise. Seriously, what do you expect?
We are human, bred for empathy. But to be violent we must lose a part of ourselves, believe that we are powerful, believe that the subject of our aggression deserves it. Managed violence – boxing, war – demands that we behave this way in defined circumstances while resisting those trained instincts outside of them. It’s hardly surprising that sometimes violence spills over the boundaries we set for it.
So we have two boxers belting each other at a press conference and soldiers beating prisoners or pissing on enemy corpses. As a public we recoil at the defiance of these boundaries and yet, for our entertainment or military needs, we require our boxers and soldiers to spend their professional lives doing the most inhuman things to others without going so far as to offend our sensibilities.
When will we learn that that it is violence itself, in all its forms, that must be banished from any culture that wishes to call itself progressive?